Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
IP Issues
§The UML2 project verifies that:
§the about files and use licenses are in place
§all contributions (code, documentation, images, etc) have been committed by individuals who are either Members of the Foundation, or have signed the appropriate Committer Agreement; in either case, these are individuals who have signed, and are abiding by, the Eclipse IP Policy
§all significant contributions have been reviewed by the Foundation's legal staff
§that all non-committer code contributions, including third-party libraries, have been documented in the release and reviewed by the Foundation's legal staff
§all contribution questionnaires have been completed
As per the Eclipse IP Policy, the project verifies that:
... that the about files and use licenses are in place
... all contributions (code, documentation, images, etc) have been committed by individuals who are either Members of the Foundation, or have signed the appropriate Committer Agreement. In either case, these are individuals who have signed, and are abiding by, the Eclipse IP Policy.
... that all significant contributions have been reviewed by the Foundation's legal staff.
... that all non-committer code contributions, including third-party libraries, have been documented in the release and reviewed by the Foundation's legal staff
... that all contribution questionnaires have been completed

The EMO explicitly asks during the Release Review if any Member would like to assert that this release infringes their IP rights. If so, the EMO and the project will follow the Eclipse IP Policy in discussions with that Member.
Reason: One of the important benefits that the Eclipse Foundation provides for its members is the consistent application of the Eclipse IP Policy which helps ensure (but does not guarantee) that the framework and tools are useable in commercial products.